ACER eNews


Effect of geographical location on student performance A recent study examined the effect of geographical location on the performance of students from schools from all parts of Australia who participated in the OECD/Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2000). Almost 5500 students from 231 schools across Australian major cities, inner regional, outer regional, remote and very remote areas participated. In PISA, students in remote areas were not achieving at the same level as their city counterparts. Results for Australian schools located in major cities and inner regional areas were above the OECD average in reading literacy. Outer regional areas and remote and very remote areas were at or below the OECD average. Levels of proficiency were described, with Level 1 being the most basic and Level 5 the most complex. It was found that 27 per cent of students from remote areas were achieving at the two lowest levels, compared to 12 per cent of students from major cities. At the other end of the scale, 18 per cent of remote students achieved at the two highest levels, compared to 46 per cent of the city students. The most important factor positively associated with success in reading literacy was students' engagement with reading. This was measured by asking students about their reading habits including how often they read, what material they prefer reading and their interest in reading. Students from remote areas scored lower on this factor than students from city areas. Although the pattern of use of school libraries was similar in all areas, students from remote locations did not have access to cultural activities such as live theatre. Cultural activities have been found to be positively correlated with performance in reading. The study also found that females outscored males in reading literacy in all locations; the level of parent education attained was associated with higher student performance in all locations; students in remote areas have access to well-qualified teachers, although they reported the highest level of teacher shortage; and schools in remote areas tended to have a lower level of resources. After a number of factors such as engagement with reading, gender and home background were taken into account, the effect of location was much less significant. The full report, Location, Location, Location: Implications of Geographic Situation on Australian Student Performance in PISA 2000, by John Cresswell and Cathy Underwood is published as ACER Research Monograph number 58. Print copies of the report can be purchased through ACER Press. Online at ACER Shop 1800 338 402 (Toll Free) T:+ 61 3 9277 5447 F:+ 61 3 9560 4799 E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) « Back to eNews
Copyright © Australian Council for Educational Research 2013 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Copyright Act 1968 of Australia and subsequent amendments, no part of this electronic publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without written permission. Please address any requests to reproduce information to communications@acer.edu.au Subscribe Unsubscribe Australian Council for Educational Research Private Bag 55, Camberwell, Victoria Australia 3124 Tel: + 61 3 9277 5555 Fax: + 61 3 9277 5500 Web: www.acer.edu.au

A recent study examined the effect of geographical location on the performance of students from schools from all parts of Australia who participated in the OECD/Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2000).

Almost 5500 students from 231 schools across Australian major cities, inner regional, outer regional, remote and very remote areas participated.

In PISA, students in remote areas were not achieving at the same level as their city counterparts. Results for Australian schools located in major cities and inner regional areas were above the OECD average in reading literacy. Outer regional areas and remote and very remote areas were at or below the OECD average.

Levels of proficiency were described, with Level 1 being the most basic and Level 5 the most complex. It was found that 27 per cent of students from remote areas were achieving at the two lowest levels, compared to 12 per cent of students from major cities. At the other end of the scale, 18 per cent of remote students achieved at the two highest levels, compared to 46 per cent of the city students.

The most important factor positively associated with success in reading literacy was students' engagement with reading. This was measured by asking students about their reading habits including how often they read, what material they prefer reading and their interest in reading. Students from remote areas scored lower on this factor than students from city areas.

Although the pattern of use of school libraries was similar in all areas, students from remote locations did not have access to cultural activities such as live theatre. Cultural activities have been found to be positively correlated with performance in reading.

The study also found that females outscored males in reading literacy in all locations; the level of parent education attained was associated with higher student performance in all locations; students in remote areas have access to well-qualified teachers, although they reported the highest level of teacher shortage; and schools in remote areas tended to have a lower level of resources.

After a number of factors such as engagement with reading, gender and home background were taken into account, the effect of location was much less significant.

The full report, Location, Location, Location: Implications of Geographic Situation on Australian Student Performance in PISA 2000, by John Cresswell and Cathy Underwood is published as ACER Research Monograph number 58.

Print copies of the report can be purchased through ACER Press.
Online at ACER Shop
1800 338 402 (Toll Free)
T:+ 61 3 9277 5447
F:+ 61 3 9560 4799
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Effect of geographical location on student performance